Alternative Investments
Alternative investments—assets outside traditional stocks, bonds, and cash—promise diversification and higher returns. But they come with higher fees, illiquidity, complexity, and often disappointing results. Here's what you need to know before venturing beyond the basics.
⚠️ Not for Beginners
Most investors should master stocks, bonds, and index funds before considering alternatives. Complexity, fees, and illiquidity make alternatives unsuitable for core portfolios. The best alternative investment for most people is none at all.
What Are Alternative Investments?
Definition: Assets that don't fit into traditional categories (stocks, bonds, cash).
Common types:
- Private equity / Venture capital
- Hedge funds
- Real estate (beyond REITs)
- Commodities (gold, oil, agriculture)
- Collectibles (art, wine, classic cars)
- Cryptocurrencies
- Structured products
- Peer-to-peer lending
Private Equity & Venture Capital
What It Is
Private equity (PE): Buying stakes in private companies (not publicly traded)
Venture capital (VC): Investing in early-stage startups with high growth potential
How it works:
- PE firms raise capital from institutions and wealthy individuals
- Buy companies, restructure, improve operations, sell for profit (3-7 year hold)
- VC firms fund startups in exchange for equity, hoping for 10x+ returns on winners
Historical Returns
- Top quartile PE funds: 15-20% annual returns (outperform public markets)
- Median PE funds: Similar to S&P 500 after fees
- Bottom quartile: Underperform significantly
- VC funds: Highly skewed—top 5% capture most returns, median loses money
The catch: Retail investors rarely access top-tier funds. The best PE/VC firms are closed to new investors or require $10M+ minimums.
Risks & Downsides
- Illiquidity: Money locked up 7-10+ years, no early exit
- High fees: 2% management + 20% performance ("2 and 20")
- Selection risk: Difficult to identify top funds in advance
- Valuation opacity: Hard to know true value until exit
- Minimum investments: $250K-$10M for most funds
📊 Yale Endowment Model
Yale's endowment famously allocates 50%+ to alternatives (PE, VC, real estate, hedge funds). Result: 12.4% annual returns over 30 years, beating most endowments.
But: Yale has access to best-in-class managers, $40B+ scale, infinite time horizon, and institutional expertise. Retail investors can't replicate this.
Hedge Funds
What They Are
Investment funds using sophisticated strategies: long/short, arbitrage, derivatives, leverage to generate "absolute returns" (profit in any market).
Common strategies:
- Long/short equity: Buy undervalued stocks, short overvalued
- Market neutral: Balanced long/short to eliminate market risk
- Event-driven: Mergers, bankruptcies, special situations
- Global macro: Bet on currencies, rates, commodities based on economic trends
- Relative value: Exploit pricing inefficiencies (arbitrage)
The Reality
Historical performance (2000-2020):
- Average hedge fund: ~6% annual return
- S&P 500: ~10% annual return
- 60/40 stock/bond portfolio: ~8% return
After fees (2 and 20): Net returns often underperform index funds significantly.
Why the poor performance?
- Fees destroy returns (3-4% annual drag)
- Strategy crowding (everyone doing the same arbitrage trades = smaller gains)
- Difficulty timing markets/trades
- Many funds close to new investors when they have edge, reopen when desperate (adverse selection)
🚨 The Warren Buffett Bet
In 2008, Buffett bet $1M that an S&P 500 index fund would beat a basket of hedge funds over 10 years. Result (2018): Index fund +125%, hedge funds +36%. Buffett won easily.
"When trillions of dollars are managed by Wall Streeters charging high fees, it will usually be the managers who reap outsized profits, not the clients." — Warren Buffett
Commodities
What They Are
Physical goods: gold, silver, oil, natural gas, agriculture, industrial metals
Ways to invest:
- Physical (gold coins, bars)
- Commodity ETFs (GLD for gold, USO for oil)
- Futures contracts
- Commodity-producing stocks (miners, energy companies)
Gold: The Classic Alternative
Proponents claim:
- Inflation hedge
- Safe haven during crises
- Portfolio diversifier
- Store of value for 5,000 years
The reality:
- Long-term returns: ~2% real (after inflation) over centuries
- Volatility: Higher than stocks in many periods
- No income: Doesn't pay dividends or interest
- Inflation hedge? Inconsistent—gold crashed 1980-2000 despite inflation
- Crisis protection? Sometimes works (2008), sometimes doesn't (1987 crash, 2020 COVID initial drop)
Reasonable allocation: 5-10% for diversification, not as core holding
Other Commodities
- Oil/Energy: Extremely volatile, negative correlation to stocks inconsistent
- Agriculture: Subject to weather, geopolitics, difficult to predict
- Industrial metals: Tied to economic growth, cyclical
Problem: Most commodity ETFs use futures (rolling contracts), which causes "contango loss" (buying high, selling low on rollovers). Long-term returns disappointing.
Collectibles
Art, Wine, Classic Cars, etc.
The appeal: Passion assets that might appreciate + enjoyment
Historical returns (varies widely):
- Blue-chip art: 7-10% annually (estimates)
- Fine wine: 5-15% (highly variable)
- Classic cars: 5-12%
The problems:
- Illiquidity: Can take months/years to sell at fair price
- Transaction costs: Auction fees 10-25%
- Storage/insurance: Ongoing costs (climate control, security)
- Expertise required: Fraud, fakes, condition issues
- No income: Zero dividends or interest
- Concentration risk: Few items = high individual item risk
- Tax treatment: Collectibles taxed at 28% (vs 15-20% for stocks)
Bottom line: Buy what you love and can afford to lose. Don't count on appreciation for retirement funding.
Cryptocurrencies
The Case For
- Decentralized, censorship-resistant
- Limited supply (Bitcoin: 21M cap)
- Digital gold narrative
- Blockchain technology innovation
- Potential inflation hedge
The Case Against
- Extreme volatility: 50-80% drawdowns common
- No intrinsic value: Worth what someone will pay, nothing else
- Regulatory risk: Governments could ban/restrict
- Technology risk: Quantum computing, better crypto could emerge
- Security risk: Hacks, lost keys = permanent loss
- Limited real-world use: Few merchants accept, slow/expensive transactions
- Environmental concerns: Bitcoin mining energy consumption
Historical returns:
- Bitcoin (2011-2021): ~200% CAGR (but with -80% crashes)
- Most altcoins: -90%+ from peaks, many go to zero
Reasonable allocation: 1-5% maximum, only if you can stomach -80% drawdowns and potential total loss
⚠️ Crypto Warning
Thousands of cryptocurrencies exist. 99% will go to zero. Even Bitcoin could become obsolete. Never invest money you can't afford to lose completely. Not backed by assets, earnings, or governments—pure speculation.
Real Estate (Beyond REITs)
Direct Property Ownership
Rental properties:
- Pros: Cash flow, leverage, tax benefits, appreciation
- Cons: Illiquid, management burden, tenant issues, concentration risk, high transaction costs
Real returns: 8-12% including rent and appreciation (but before time/effort)
Real Estate Crowdfunding
Platforms like Fundrise, RealtyMogul allow $500-$5K minimums for commercial real estate pools.
- Pros: Lower minimums, diversification, passive
- Cons: Fees (1-2%), illiquidity (5+ year lockups), platform risk, limited track record
REITs: The Better Alternative
Publicly-traded REITs offer:
- Liquidity (sell anytime)
- Diversification (hundreds of properties)
- Professional management
- Low fees (0.1-0.5% for REIT ETFs)
- Income (4-6% dividend yields)
For most investors, REIT index funds beat direct ownership or crowdfunding.
Structured Products
What they are: Complex securities combining bonds, options, derivatives to create specific risk/return profiles
Examples:
- Principal-protected notes (100% downside protection, capped upside)
- Reverse convertibles (high yield, but can convert to stock if it drops)
- Market-linked CDs
The problem:
- Extremely complex (most buyers don't understand them)
- High embedded fees (2-5%)
- Issuer credit risk (if bank fails, you lose)
- Illiquidity (hard to sell before maturity)
- Terms often favor issuer, not buyer
Verdict: Avoid. You can replicate most strategies cheaper with ETFs and options.
Should You Invest in Alternatives?
Alternatives make sense if:
- You've maxed out tax-advantaged accounts with low-cost index funds
- You have >$1M net worth and need further diversification
- You have expertise in the specific alternative (e.g., real estate professional)
- You can access top-tier funds (institutional connections)
- You can afford illiquidity (won't need the money for 10+ years)
- You understand the risks and fees
Alternatives DON'T make sense if:
- You're trying to "get rich quick"
- You don't fully understand the investment
- You're chasing past performance
- Fees exceed 1% annually
- You need liquidity within 5 years
- You haven't built a solid core portfolio first
✅ The 90/10 Rule
Warren Buffett's advice for his estate: 90% in S&P 500 index fund, 10% in short-term bonds. Zero alternatives.
If the greatest investor of all time recommends index funds, maybe that's the answer for most of us.
Key Takeaways
- Alternative investments = assets outside stocks, bonds, cash (PE, hedge funds, commodities, crypto, collectibles)
- Top-tier PE/VC outperform, but retail investors rarely access best funds
- Average hedge fund underperforms index funds after fees (Buffett bet proved this)
- Gold: ~2% real returns over long term, inconsistent inflation hedge
- Collectibles: high transaction costs, illiquidity, no income, expertise required
- Crypto: extreme volatility, speculative, reasonable allocation 1-5% max
- Direct real estate: good returns but illiquid, management burden—REITs often better
- Structured products: complex, high fees, favor issuer—avoid
- Fees (2 and 20) destroy alternative investment returns
- Illiquidity is a major drawback—money locked up 5-10+ years
- Most investors should master stocks/bonds before considering alternatives
- Yale endowment model requires institutional access and expertise—not replicable
- Buffett recommends 90% S&P 500, 10% bonds—zero alternatives
- If you don't understand it, don't invest in it